Failure review intake
Submit a stuck AI app
Send a short summary of the project, what is broken, and what decision you need. I will tell you whether it is suitable for a structured failure review.
This is for AI-built apps, AI-generated MVPs, no-code projects, automation workflows, or codebases that are broken, unstable, stuck, unsafe to launch, or unclear whether they should be fixed, rebuilt, handed off, or stopped.
This is a fix-or-rebuild failure review designed to clarify the safest next step before more work is added.
This is not a certified security audit or legal compliance review.
This is designed to help you decide what to do next before production risk grows.
For agencies and builders, the review can be used behind the scenes before more delivery time is spent on the wrong fixes.
How it works
A safer way to decide before another AI rewrite
Submit safe context first. I check whether a structured Fix-or-Rebuild Review is useful, and you only receive payment instructions if the request is a good fit.
Safe to submit: app context, screenshots, public errors, preview links. Never send API keys, secrets, or customer data.
Submit a Review RequestWhat you’ll receive
A review is not a promise to fix the app. It identifies the production risk layer, what not to change next, and the safest path before AI edits make the project harder to launch. If you are unsure whether the project should be rescued or restarted, compare the decision path in should I fix or rebuild my AI app.
Example review
Verdict
Not ready for production without auth and data access review
Failure layer
Auth + Supabase RLS + deployment environment boundary
Production risk
The app works in preview, but policies, storage access, and Vercel environment separation have not been verified.
What AI should not touch
Do not let AI rewrite auth, RLS, or storage policies without a model.
Smallest safe next step
Confirm data ownership and negative access tests before changing app code.
Best for AI-built apps before production
This review is useful when an AI-built app looks close to launch but the production risk is unclear.
- Lovable, Cursor, Claude Code, v0, Bolt, or Replit-built apps before launch
- Apps that work as demos but involve real users, production data, or payments
- Supabase auth, RLS, storage, database, or permission concerns
- Founders, agencies, and builders deciding whether to fix, rebuild, hand off, or stop
Delivery
- Fix-or-rebuild judgment
- Failure layer diagnosis
- Fix / rebuild / handoff / stop recommendation
- What not to change next
- Suggested safe next step
- Delivered by email
What this review decides
- Fix: the issue is local and recoverable.
- Rebuild: the structure is too unstable to keep patching.
- Handoff: another team should continue only after the failure layer is documented.
- Stop: the project may not be worth more spend in its current form.
What to submit
- What the app is supposed to do
- What tool or stack was used
- What broke
- What changed before it broke
- Links to repo, deployment, screenshots, errors, or Loom/video if available
- Whether real users, payments, auth, database data, or deployment errors are involved
Submit a stuck AI app summary
Share the minimum context needed to identify what is broken, what is risky, and whether the safest path is to fix, rebuild, hand off, or stop.
Early review
$29
Structured review · delivered by email
Submitting a summary does not guarantee a review. I first check whether the case is clear enough and whether a review would be useful.
Before you submit
You do not need to send:
- Full private repo
- Production secrets
- API keys
- Customer data
Useful to include:
- App purpose and current stack
- AI tool used
- Live status and production data status
- Main concern and decision needed
- Safe app, preview, or repo link if available
What this is — and is not
This is
- A structured production risk review
- A failure-layer diagnosis
- A fix / rebuild / handoff / stop recommendation
- A safe-next-step recommendation before touching production
This is not
- A guarantee that the app is secure
- A certified security audit
- A legal or compliance review
- An open-ended implementation service
Diagnosis
Need a fix-or-rebuild judgment?
Submit a stuck AI app for review before spending more time on the wrong fixes.
Second technical judgment · delivered by email · no secrets required